Have you ever used software that functions well but is frustrating to use? Or encountered features that distract from your day-to-day use of the software? A common scenario in software development occurs when teams build what they think their users want or need, rather than what users are actually looking for. This disconnect doesn't just lead to poor user experiences; it erodes software quality at its core.
The Humility Problem in Software Development
There's an inherent paradox in software development: software companies pride themselves on building solutions for users but often forget that the end user is the product expert. Instead of making assumptions about what users need, we need to approach our users with humility and curiosity. We must recognize users as the experts and look to them for guidance on how they use our product and how we can best improve it to suit their needs. While we may be the technical experts in building the product, our users are the experts in how they use the software, how it affects their daily life and work, and how new features can improve their experience. Instead of seeing users as afterthoughts at the end of development, we must see them as valuable resources.
The Cost of Assumptions
When we don't center UX throughout design and development, the costs are substantial. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, poor user interface design and requirements gathering account for over 50% of software development issues. This is significant—because users weren't the focus throughout design and development, issues in production increased by 50%. As we know, the cost of fixing issues in production is exponentially higher than fixing these same issues during development, let alone preventing them from occurring in the first place. The true cost of forgetting the user extends beyond financial impact—it's measured in lost opportunities, frustrated users, and solutions that miss their mark entirely.
Think about how often:
Features are built that users never asked for
"Intuitive" interfaces are designed that only make sense to developers
Problems are solved that weren't actually problems for our users
User feedback is dismissed because "they just don't know how to use it yet"
Curiosity: The Foundation of Quality
Quality software development requires curiosity about our users. Not just surface-level curiosity about which features they might want, but deep curiosity about:
Understanding the User's World
Who they are as people
What their daily challenges look like
How they actually use our software in real-world conditions
Exploring User Pain Points and Successes
What frustrates them
What delights them
What they're trying to achieve
This curiosity helps us better respond to user feedback as learning opportunities, center the user in design, development and testing, and build with empathy.
To build truly quality products, this curiosity needs to permeate every stage of development:
In Design
Ask questions before proposing solutions
Challenge our assumptions about user needs
Engage with users early and often
Create prototypes to test ideas, not to validate our assumptions
Be willing to discard ideas that users don't connect with
In Development
Question whether technical solutions align with user needs
Consider the real-world context of how features will be used
Build flexibility into solutions to accommodate different user preferences
Implement instrumentation to understand actual usage patterns
Stay connected to user feedback throughout the build process
In Testing
Test not just for functionality, but for usability
Observe how users actually interact with features
Pay attention to user workarounds—they often indicate design failures
Question whether passing test cases actually translate to user success
Building a Culture of User-Centered Quality
Creating truly quality software requires building a culture where we care about our users—where the user is valued as more than just a metric.
To achieve this:
User research should be valued as highly as technical expertise
Questions should be encouraged at every stage
Assumptions should be regularly challenged
Feedback should be actively sought
Failure to meet user needs should be seen as a learning opportunity
The Bottom Line
Quality isn't just about bug-free code or perfectly functioning features. It's about building software that truly meets users' needs. This requires more than technical expertise—it requires curiosity, humility, and a genuine commitment to understanding and serving our users. True quality begins with curiosity and the humility to listen to users.
Comments